CIPP-Based Evaluation of the Learning Process in Vocational High Schools: Student and Teacher Perspectives

Almes Gangga; Hasan Maksum; Ambiyar Ambiyar

doi:10.58740/juwara.v6i1.783

Authors

Almes Gangga Universitas Negeri Padang
Hasan Maksum Universitas Negeri Padang
Ambiyar Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58740/juwara.v6i1.783

Keywords:

CIPP Model, Learning Evaluation, Process Evaluation, SMK, Vocational Education

Abstract

This research evaluates the learning process in vocational high schools (SMK) using all four components of the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model from the perspectives of students and teachers. A descriptive-evaluative approach was employed involving 120 students and 25 teachers at SMK Negeri 1 Painan, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using validated questionnaires comprising 66 items for students and 59 items for teachers, structured around all four CIPP components, with particular depth on four Process sub-components: Teaching Strategy (P1), Media and Technology Use (P2), Student Interaction (P3), and Assessment Process (P4). The Context component received the highest scores from both groups (students: 76.4%; teachers: 83.2%), while the Product component scored the lowest among students (70.2%). The Process component was rated 72.5% by students and 80.2% by teachers overall, with Student Interaction (P3) as the strongest sub-component and Media and Technology Use (P2) as the most critical area for improvement. A consistent perception gap averaging 7.7 percentage points was identified across all components, with teachers rating program implementation more favorably than students throughout. These findings reveal systemic challenges in technology integration, assessment practices, and resource provision in vocational learning, and provide evidence-based recommendations for policy and instructional improvement in Indonesian vocational education.

References

Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011). Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.06.001

Cedefop. (2020). Vocational education and training in Europe: Key challenges and policy responses. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications/4198

Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., Walker, D. F., & Weiner, S. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. Jossey-Bass.

Daryanto. (2010). Evaluasi pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.

Direktorat PSMK. (2018). Panduan penilaian di SMK. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Pearson.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hamalik, O. (2011). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.

Hamid, M. A., Yunus, M. M., & Embi, M. A. (2017). The use of ICT in vocational education: A review. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.010

Hidayat, R., & Sukardi. (2022). Evaluation of learning implementation in vocational schools using the CIPP model. Journal of Vocational Education Studies, 5(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v5i1.5082

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Renstra Kemendikbud 2020–2024. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Majid, A. (2014). Penilaian autentik proses dan hasil belajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan (2nd ed.). Parama Publishing.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Oriondo, L. L., & Antonio, E. M. D. (2002). Evaluating educational outcomes: Tests, measurement, and evaluation (4th ed.). Florentino.

Permendikbud No. 53 Tahun 2015. Tentang penilaian hasil belajar oleh pendidik dan satuan pendidikan. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Rusman. (2012). Belajar dan pembelajaran berbasis komputer. Alfabeta.

Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). Routledge.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (3rd ed.). Alfabeta.

Sukardi. (2014). Evaluasi program pendidikan dan kepelatihan. Bumi Aksara.

Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2008). Evaluasi program dan instrumen evaluasi untuk program pendidikan dan penelitian. Rineka Cipta.

UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2019). Work-based learning in vocational education and training: A practical guide for institutions. UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre. https://unevoc.unesco.org/home/Publications/lang=en/akt=detail/page=unvocatpub/qs=4510

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wirawan. (2020). Evaluasi: Teori, model, metodologi, standar, aplikasi dan profesi. Rajawali Press.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016